Re: Money

[Warwick Janetzki <giants@icplus.net.au>]

Mike Allen wrote:
> 
> Warwick wrote:
> 
> "I dont think Jordan is a good comparison. Jordan says that he doesn't
> understand the big contracts and then goes out and asks to be paid the
> highest and almost double if not infact double more than the 2nd highest
> paid player. That to me is a hipicrite. Although he didn't whinge about
> it while he was in the contract."
> 
> I have to disagree with you Warwick to some extent.  I think that Jordan is
> probably a good comparison, he is the one responsible for globalizing the
> game, he has made the league billons of dollars, IMO he should get some
> share of that money, in a league where no-talents (Shaq) pull off 100 mil
> contracts without winning a championship, Jordan has proven that he 1.
> generates money and 2. wins championships.
> 
> Mike

That is undeniable and infact after thinking about it for a while I down
right agree, but then Bird, Magic, Wilt, etc. should come back and play
for their cash as they are money machines and can win titles.

Warwick 
- -- 
MZ