[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
rookies
- Subject: rookies
- Date: Sunday, November 23, 1997 2:49 PM
>I think that in all the concern over Billups' struggles, we have lost
sight
>of Mercer. It's understandable, since Billups is basically who we got
>intstead of Tim Duncan, but what probably should have happened is that we
>drafted Mercer at three, and billups at six. That is more appopriate to
>their talents, and would explain much this season. Mercer is a wonderful
>surprise. I have never seen a player with his talent come into the game so
>fundamentally sound and mentally mature. He has 5+ physical ability as a
>two. Just look where he shoots his jumper from. Who could ever block
that?
> His rimrattling dunks are breathtaking as well, and yet this is a player
as
>humble and system oriented as Steve Kerr or John Paxson. Talk about a rara
>avis! Mercer has not been called upon yet to take charge on offense, but
he
>will. Once he starts hitting his shots, he will begin to fake the screen
or
>pick and reverse against the D, making him a 30 point threat. The fact
that
>he is a fine FT shooter doesnt hurt either. (what are his stats?)
>
>I for one think that if Billups doesnt improve as a point by midseason, we
>should consider finding a way to use his money (e.g. getting a class of 95
>fa) to buy Damon Stoudamire. Steve Nash certainly isn't value, but this
team
> needs a fast point, and those aren't skills you pick up on the run.
> Chauncey is settling in; but he has to show us he ccan run the break. My
>ideal celtics point guard is still Jason Kidd, the throwback.
>