[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WHAT?!!!
- Subject: Re: WHAT?!!!
- From: Warwick Janetzki <giants@icplus.net.au>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 02:01:22 -0700
Uncle Odie wrote:
>
> <<I think Rick is becoming very trade happy and very, very impatient. He
> has the youngest team in the NBA playing a style that barley worked with
> Kentucky.>>
>
> What in the world are you talking about??? "Barely worked at Kentucky"
> (I won't point out the spelling because I make mistakes as well) That
> style WAS successful at Kentucky. In addition, if it "barely" worked,
> why are there so many of Rick's former assistant coaches employed as
> coaches? Guess what, they use this style as well. Sendek at NC State,
> Donovan at Florida, Tubby Smith at UK, Willard at Pitt. Fortunately,
> you know that this style "barely works" or else you may have had the
> misfortune of being hired as a head coach as well.
>
> I realize that I am new to this list & I am probably Pitino's chief
> apologist here. However, please give the man some time. The Celtics
> didn't "give away the farm" to obtain the services of a coach that
> employs a style that "barely works".
>
I agree. So much success for something that barely works.
How many times did Kentucky go to the Final 4 for something that 'barely
worked'???
I'd love to have that success rate for something that 'barely worked'.
If I had it, then I'd be in the NBA just like Rick and I would be in the
position to trade or draft for a lot of my ex-stars, which there are
plenty of players from.
Mashburn, Walker, Chapman, Mercer, Anderson, etc, etc.
Barely worked?
FOOEY to you too!
Warwick
- --
MZ