Re: Viper vs. 993

["Billy T." <btylaska@onramp.net>]

okay, okay, but what about the NA 3.6 aircooled motor?  Still putting out 77 hp per
versus the 56 per for the viper:)

Now, don't get me wrong, the Viper GTS is an amazing car, especially for the money,
I mean, if you have 80K lying around.  Seeing as how the porsche goes for a cool 105
thousand, the Viper is a bargain.

Bill Hussey wrote:

> Ohh now ... come on Billy ... you should know it's taboo to do a HP-Per-Litre
> comparison between a normally aspirated engine and a forced induction engine :-)
>
> Bill
> '98 GLX
>
> "Billy T." wrote:
>
> > It doesn't take a genius to extract 450 hp from ten cylinders, and 8 liters of
> > displacement.  The porsch makes 111 hp per liter, where as the Viper is making
> > only 56!  A bonestock VR6 is makeing 61 per liter.
> >
> > I still vote for the Porsche.
> >
> > b-