[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Billups et al
- Subject: RE: Billups et al
- From: John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 09:15:30 -0800
On Sunday, November 30, 1997 1:36 PM, Warwick Janetzki
[SMTP:giants@icplus.net.au] wrote:
> John Lyell wrote:
> >
> > Actually that really means little. Where was Walker chosen ? Where
was
> > Joe Smith chosen ? Which has been more productive and seems to have
more
> > talent ?
> >
> > Where was Sam Bowie chosen ? Where was Michael Jordan chosen ? Enough
> > said.
> >
> All top 10 picks. Nash was chosen in the teens, in what was considered a
> pretty untalented draft *apart from the top 7 or 8*
>
> Bowie was drafted due to need not skill. Portland already had Clyde
> Drexler, they had no need for MJ, although now you can say that they
> should have picked MJ *as we all know they should have*
>
> So in effect it does say something.
>
> Warwick
>
"Draft for need" wasn't that the Celtics excuse for the Eric Willaims, Dee
Brown, Eric Montross, & Acie Earl selections ?
If the Celtics had a center like San Antonio and had the #1 pick, would
they have pased on Duncan ? The pre-Pitino regime probably would have
knowing their history of poor selections.