RE: Knicks friend

[John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>]

The Lakers want Richmond bad, I would move Declercq, Billups & Brown to =
Sacramento for Richmond and Williamson and then move Richmond for Eddie =
Jones.  Eddie is a stud who doesn't want to play for Sacramento(who =
does) and is a proven commodity.  Childs has been a disappointment , we =
should have kept Wesley.=20

- -----Original Message-----
From:	Matt Keenan [SMTP:makeenan@liberty.edu]
Sent:	Thursday, November 06, 1997 7:51 AM
To:	giants@icplus.net.au; celtics@igtc.COM
Subject:	Re: Knicks friend

At 12:19 AM 11/7/97 +1100, Warwick Janetzki wrote:
>a friend off of the Knicks list has said that the Knicks, Celtics and
>Sacramento Kings are about half way through completing a 3 way deal.
>
>The players involved would likely be
>
>Celtics- Billups, DeClercq, Brown
>Sacramento- Richmond, Williamson, Hurley, Michael Smith
>New York- LJ, Houston and Childs.
>
>He never knew where players are going but here is my conclusion
>
>Celtics get- Childs, Williamson and LJ or Houston
>
>Knicks get- Richmond, Hurley, Michael Smith=20
>
>Kings get- Billups, DeClercq, Brown and Houston or LJ
>
>so basically its
>
>Celtics- Billups, DeClercq, Brown for Childs, Williamson and LJ or
>Houston
>
>Knicks- LJ, Houston and Childs for Richmond, Hurley, Michael Smith
>
>Kings- Richmond, Williamson, Hurley, Michael Smith for Billups,
>DeClercq, Brown and Houston or LJ
>
>again I only posted this because it was involving the Celtics. I dont
>believe it has any chance of happening as its probably just another one
>of the ones that wont work out cap wise, which is probable unless the
>kings are WAY under the cap.
>
>Warwick
>
Freaking A!!!!!!!!! I say go for it!!! Could you imagine if the Celts =
had
LJ or any of the above mentioned? Any trade would be worth it if it =
meant
getting rid of Dee Brown!!! Like I've said before... "Get out of =
Beantown
Baby!!!"